I'm all for moving to git but I admit it took me a good while before I grasped the typical workflows with git, even with all the documentation available. Also, moving to git means all the build/ sanity checking/ packaging would need to be reviewed and corrected (for example no svn:* properties, etc.).
Maven folks recently switched to git -- I've been tracking it loosely, Benson may have more insight into how it went. Dawid On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, it's not everyone's favorite tool, but it sure seems to be the most >> popular tool. >> > > My main question is, is it really git thats popular, or github? > > if git would really bring in more contributions, we should do it. But > would it do that without github, or just make things more complex? > > It has such a crappy commandline that is the "price" for using it, and > if that buys us nothing, it would be a waste of effort :) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
