[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13494117#comment-13494117
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-752:
-----------------------------------
LUCENE-4226 basically does this but you can't configure codecs; you pick a
codec in its default mode. The Compressing codec defaults to "fast" and yields
~50% savings based on Adrien's tests of a "small to medium" sized index:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4226?focusedCommentId=13451708&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13451708
But what I'd like to see is the ability to compress a large text field (alone),
for the purposes of highlighting, and much more than 50% compression. It might
not be able to handle that many concurrent requests to meet response time SLAs,
but some search apps aren't under high load.
> Allow better Field Compression options
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-752
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-752
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: compressed_field.patch, compressedtextfield.patch
>
>
> See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/sd4mgwud6caevb35?q=compression
> It would be good if Solr handled field compression outside of Lucene's
> Field.COMPRESS capabilities, since those capabilities are less than ideal
> when it comes to control over compression.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
