I think the idea is to catch files you forgot to svn add. For IDE files, you should just svn ignore them?
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:46 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <[email protected]> wrote: > "ant precommit" will check if the source tree is "dirty" (i.e. contains files > not in source control) and stop with a failure if so. I find that rather > annoying since I've usually got a variety of .patch files and IDE config > changes. What is the rationale behind this check? How do people usually > deal with it? Perhaps if I do my real development on another checkout (git > based), I could then patch on the svn one for the commit. Pretty annoying > though, and the 4x port is yet another step. There sure is a lot of burden > to getting commits in. I no longer care to improve little javadoc and typo > stuff. > > ~ David > > > > ----- > Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ant-precommit-annoyed-with-checkout-is-dirty-tp4022362.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
