It was my hope that by now, the dismax & edismax distinction would be a thing of the past, such that we'd simply call this by one name, simply "dismax". >From memories of various JIRA commentary, Jan wants this too and made great progress enhancing edismax, but Hoss pushed back on edismax overtaking dismax as "the" one new dismax. I see this as very unfortunate, as having both complicates things and makes it harder to write them in books ;-) I'd love to simply say "dismax" without having to say "edismax" or wonder if when someone said "dismax" they meant "edismax", etc. Does anyone see this changing / progressing?
~ David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/dismax-vs-edismax-tp4022834.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
