On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 17:18 +0100, Per Steffensen wrote: > With change/merge-tracking in both system, the important thing must be > that you do not have to throw the tracked information away before in > you attempt to get your changes into the main repository.
People write commit messages in many different ways and have different working habits. Inserting all commit messages from a patch would probably be quite messy for some patches, e.g. I have a tendency to make many small commits, where a lot of those are just added TODO's, cosmetic enhancements or spelling corrections. Of course, git's rebase would mitigate this. As a non-committer and newly converted git user, I'd much prefer to use git for working on Lucene/Solr patches. Michael Sokolov's analysis is spot on. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
