[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13536331#comment-13536331 ]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4220: ----------------------------------- +1 - Im very interested in this as well. CoreAdminHandler should not be configured and routed under core - it should be at the CoreContainer level. This would be a huge improvement. > Move RequestHandler for global Information out of core-scope > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-4220 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4220 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: web gui > Reporter: Stefan Matheis (steffkes) > Assignee: Hoss Man > > Okay, the title perhaps wins no price right now .. but i don't have an better > idea, i'm sorry - if you do, don't hesitate to update it! > What it's all about: SOLR-3633 was created because at the moment it's not > possible to use the Admin UI w/o at least one core. The reason for that is, > that some (as you might think) "global" Information - which the UI shows on > the top-level (which doesn't require you selecting a core) - must be fetched > from a core-related url, because that's how the solr routing works right now. > Hoss and I talked about that at the ApacheCon and he mentioned that this > should not be that biggest change although we need to update the tests and > ensure that the thing is still working, of course. > I checked the UI for having a list of Functions and their related urls: > * *Dashboard* > ** solr/$first_core/admin/system?wt=json > * *Logging* > ** /solr/$first_core/admin/logging?wt=json&since=N > * *Logging* / *Level* > ** /solr/$first_core/admin/logging?wt=json > * *Java Properties* > ** /solr/$first_core/admin/properties?wt=json > * *Threads* > ** /solr/$first_core/admin/threads?wt=json > For the sake of simplicity, i'd suggest that we're just moving the complete > handler (regarding their url) on level up to something like > {{/solr/admin/..}} like we have it already for the zookeeper thing? > Regarding the contained content, i think we could (or perhaps should?) stick > with the given information/content - only the Dashboard is not using all of > the provided values, but just for the fact that we have no usage for > prettified RAM-Usage numbers ... > Let me know if the Issue contains all required informations, otherwise i'll > try to update it according to your questions :) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org