[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13550383#comment-13550383
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-4134:
----------------------------------

bq. Wouldn't another alternative instead just continue to use our p.a.o/~ 
versus deploying to two places?

+1

I would suggest that for now we move forward with the simplest possible changes 
to our overall processes that satisfies infra: using the new svn repo for our 
final release "dist", but leave everything else related to RCs, and smoke 
checking, as is.

Then we can discuss/iterate on other changes to the release process at our 
leasiure (ie: maybe we put hte RCs in svn, and tweak the directory structure so 
a simple "svn mv" works for the dist files, and we have some other script for 
the maven files)
                
> modify release process/scripts to use svn for rc/release publishing 
> (svnpubsub)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4134
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4134
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.1
>
>
> By the end of 2012, all of www.apache.org *INCLUDING THE DIST DIR* must be 
> entirely managed using "svnpubsub" ... our use of the Apache CMS for 
> lucene.apache.org puts us in compliance for our main website, but the dist 
> dir use for publishing release artifacts also needs to be manaved via svn.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to