[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13558929#comment-13558929
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-4260:
------------------------------------

bq. There is a small variation in maxDoc which is expected but there is also a 
variation in docFreq which is very unexpected, docFreq must not change at all 
if i reindex the same data.

Unfortunately, deletions don't change index statistics like docFreq (this has 
been the case since the first version of Lucene).  This means that reindexing a 
document can artificially increase the docFreq until the deletion is really 
removed via merging/optimize.
                
> Inconsistent docFreq and docCount before and after forceMerge/optimize
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 5.0
>         Environment: 5.0.0.2013.01.04.15.31.51
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 5.0
>
>
> After wiping all cores and reindexing some 3.3 million docs from Nutch using 
> CloudSolrServer we see inconsistencies between the leader and replica for 
> some shards.
> Each core hold about 3.3k documents. For some reason 5 out of 10 shards have 
> a small deviation in then number of documents. The leader and slave deviate 
> for roughly 10-20 documents, not more.
> Results hopping ranks in the result set for identical queries got my 
> attention, there were small IDF differences for exactly the same record 
> causing a record to shift positions in the result set. During those tests no 
> records were indexed. Consecutive catch all queries also return different 
> number of numDocs.
> We're running a 10 node test cluster with 10 shards and a replication factor 
> of two and frequently reindex using a fresh build from trunk. I've not seen 
> this issue for quite some time until a few days ago.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to