OK I opened LUCENE-4736 and LUCENE-4737. Thanks Dawid! Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > When I run Lucene core tests with IBM J9 1.6, some tests fail with > zombie threads that could not be killed, eg: > > [junit4:junit4] ERROR 0.00s J2 | TestIndexWriterDelete (suite) <<< > [junit4:junit4] > Throwable #1: > com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakError: 1 thread leaked > from SUITE scope at org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete: > [junit4:junit4] > 1) Thread[id=102, name=Thread-44, > state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-TestIndexWriterDelete] > [junit4:junit4] > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > [junit4:junit4] > at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:196) > [junit4:junit4] > at java.util.Timer$TimerImpl.run(Timer.java:247) > [junit4:junit4] > at > __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C9014BCB129899BF]:0) > [junit4:junit4] > Throwable #2: > com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakError: There are still > zombie threads that couldn't be terminated: > [junit4:junit4] > 1) Thread[id=102, name=Thread-44, > state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-TestIndexWriterDelete] > [junit4:junit4] > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > [junit4:junit4] > at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:196) > [junit4:junit4] > at java.util.Timer$TimerImpl.run(Timer.java:247) > [junit4:junit4] > at > __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C9014BCB129899BF]:0) > > It looks like this is a JVM thread ... is there an "exceptions list" > somewhere to ignore this thread? Or some other solution? > > Second, strangely, I see the "who tests the tester tests" hit real failures, > eg: > > [junit4:junit4] FAILURE 0.01s J2 | > TestReproduceMessage.testFailureBeforeClass <<< > [junit4:junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError > [junit4:junit4] > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92) > [junit4:junit4] > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43) > [junit4:junit4] > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestReproduceMessage.testFailureBeforeClass(TestReproduceMessage.java:173) > [junit4:junit4] > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > [junit4:junit4] > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:60) > [junit4:junit4] > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) > [junit4:junit4] > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:611) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30) > [junit4:junit4] > at > com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53) > [junit4:junit4] > at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222) > [junit4:junit4] > at > org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300) > [junit4:junit4] > at > com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.execute(SlaveMain.java:180) > [junit4:junit4] > at > com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.main(SlaveMain.java:275) > [junit4:junit4] > at > com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMainSafe.main(SlaveMainSafe.java:12) > > These are tests that intentionally set up a failure, and then confirm > that the test framework catches that failure ... yet for some reason > with J9 this turns into a real failure ... any ideas? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
