Hi,
I am using solr 3.6.1. I am facing an issue with wild card search when
stemmers(kStemmer / Snowball) added.
I have field called "field_search_1".
<fieldType name="field_search_1" class="solr.TextField"
positionIncrementGap="100">
<analyzer type="index">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
protected="protwords/protwords.txt"/>
<filter class="solr.KStemFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
<analyzer type="query">
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory"
synonyms="synonyms/synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory"
protected="protwords/protwords.txt"/>
<filter class="solr.KStemFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
When i index "accessorising" into field, it's stemming value as
“accessorise” and indexing.
So if I search for,
1 -> “accessorising” (without any wild cards), query time stemming
converting it to “accessorise”, hence result finds.
2 ->“acc?ssorising” (with wild card ?), query time stemming converting it to
“acc?ssorising”(no change), hence result not able to find.
3 -> “access?rise” (with wild card ?), query time stemming converting it to
“access?rise”(no change), hence result able to find since indexed stemmed
word is “accessorise” .
So, is wild card with stemming doesn't give results as expected? Please
suggest me the solution to match the result in 1 & 2 scenarios.
Thanks in advance.
Saida Reddy.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Wild-card-support-when-stemmers-are-added-tp4038402.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
