[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572466#comment-13572466
 ] 

Ken Ip commented on SOLR-3473:
------------------------------

Hoss, any interest in bring this patch forward to trunk?
                
> Distributed deduplication broken
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3473
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3473
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud, update
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>             Fix For: 4.2, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-3473.patch, SOLR-3473.patch, SOLR-3473-trunk-2.patch
>
>
> Solr's deduplication via the SignatureUpdateProcessor is broken for 
> distributed updates on SolrCloud.
> Mark Miller:
> {quote}
> Looking again at the SignatureUpdateProcessor code, I think that indeed this 
> won't currently work with distrib updates. Could you file a JIRA issue for 
> that? The problem is that we convert update commands into solr documents - 
> and that can cause a loss of info if an update proc modifies the update 
> command.
> I think the reason that you see a multiple values error when you try the 
> other order is because of the lack of a document clone (the other issue I 
> mentioned a few emails back). Addressing that won't solve your issue though - 
> we have to come up with a way to propagate the currently lost info on the 
> update command.
> {quote}
> Please see the ML thread for the full discussion: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-deduplication-td3984657.html

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to