sure, you could just make a new issue and link it to that one if you like. thanks for looking at this!
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> wrote: > That is a pretty broad bug, but this fix is somewhere in "improve ngrams". > Maybe a specific bug linked to that one? > > Incrementing positions might be the right thing for pure ngrams. > > wunder > > On Mar 1, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Walter, sounds very interesting. Maybe just use this issue: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907 ? >> >> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Walter Underwood <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> I'm fixing position increment in EdgeNgramTokenFilter to act like synonyms, >>> with each ngram at the same position as the source token. Currently, the >>> position is incremented for each output token, which breaks phrase searching >>> with edge ngrams. >>> >>> I could not find a current Jira issue for this. Is there one? >>> >>> We are still on 3.3, but I'll submit a patch for 4.x. >>> >>> Thanks to whoever converted EdgeNgramTokenFilter to use TokenStream. >>> >>> wunder >>> -- >>> Walter Underwood >>> [email protected] >>> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
