[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13598224#comment-13598224
 ] 

Karol Sikora commented on SOLR-4540:
------------------------------------

More informations:

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "true"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_1254393"
QTime: ~50ms

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "true"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_*"
QTime: ~4500ms

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "true"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_1254393"
QTime: ~50ms

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "false"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_*"
QTime: ~4500ms

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "true"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_1254393"
QTime: ~450ms

hl.useFastVectorHighlighter: "false"
hl.q: "some_text"
hl.fl: "fulltext_*"
QTime: ~500ms

Definitly using fastVectorHighlighter with wildcards in hl.fl causes 
unacceptable QTimes.
                
> High QTime when wildcards in hl.fl are used
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4540
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4540
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: highlighter
>    Affects Versions: 4.1
>         Environment: Debian 6, Java 1.6.0_26 (Oracle)
>            Reporter: Karol Sikora
>
> I have indexed documents with fileds named like fulltext_[some id].
> I'm testing highlighting on document which have only one that field, 
> fulltext_1234.
> When 'fulltext_*' is provided as hl.fl, QTime is horribly big (> 10s), when 
> explicit 'fulltext_1234' is provided, QTime is acceptable (~30ms).
> I'm using fastVectorHighliter in both cases.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to