[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erick Erickson resolved LUCENE-778.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

SPRING_CLEANING_2013 We can reopen if necessary. Think this code has been 
extensively re-worked anyway.
                
> Allow overriding a Document
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-778
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-778
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core/index
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Nicolas Lalevée
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> In our application, we have some kind of generic API that is handling how we 
> are using Lucene. The different other applications are using this API with 
> different semantics, and are using the Lucene fields quite differently. We 
> wrote some usefull functions to do this mapping. Today, as the Document class 
> cannot be overriden, we are obliged to make a document wrapper by 
> application, ie some MyAppDocument and MyOtherAppDocument which have a 
> property holding a real Lucene Document. Then, when MyApp or MyOtherApp want 
> to use our generic lucene API, we have to "get out" the Lucene document, ie 
> do some genericLuceneAPI.writeDoc(myAppDoc.getLuceneDocument()). This work 
> fine, but it becomes quite tricky to use the other function of our generic 
> API which is genericLuceneAPI.writeDocs(Collection<Document> docs).
> I don't know the rational behind making final Document, but removing it will 
> allow more object-oriented code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to