[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13604422#comment-13604422
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4838:
------------------------------------
bq. Maybe change to termID across the board?
I think bytesID would be better since it's a BytesRefHash. Nothing says it
needs to denote a term?
bq. can we use this method also in BytesRefHash#add(BytesRef bytes, int code)
Sure, I will. Maybe instead of getOrd/BytesID I should call it find(BytesRef
bytes)?
> Add getOrd to BytesRefHash
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4838
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4838
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core/other
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-4838.patch
>
>
> There is no API today to query BytesRefHash for the existence of a certain
> BytesRef. Rather, you should use .add(), which looks up the given bytes, and
> hashes them if they are not found, or returns their ord if they are found.
> I would like to add a simple getOrd API which will return the ord of a given
> BytesRef, or -1 if not found. I would like to use that API in the facet
> module, and I need to be able to query the hash without necessarily adding
> elements to it.
> I have a simple patch, will post shortly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
