[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13604454#comment-13604454
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-1132:
------------------------------------

Looking back at this (tickled by Erick's tentative "won't fix") 4 years later, 
Solr has something very close which is the AnalyzingSuggester.  If someone 
wanted this then it would probably not be too difficult given the common 
infrastructure that spellcheck & suggesters share.
                
> Option to store original (pre-analyzed) words in dictionary
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1132
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: spellchecker
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It appears to me that the spell-check component can't build a dictionary 
> based on phonetic similarity (i.e. using a Phonetic analysis filter). Sure, 
> you can go ahead and configure the spell check component to use a field type 
> that uses a phonetic filter but the suggestions presented to the user are 
> based on the indexed values (i.e. phonemes), not the original words.  Thus 
> the user will be presented with a suggested phoneme which is a poor user 
> experience.  It's not clear how this shortcoming could be rectified because 
> for a given phoneme, there are potentially multiple words to choose from that 
> could be encoded to a given phoneme.  Ideally the more popular occurrence 
> would be chosen but I'm not sure how this would be implemented.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to