[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13609454#comment-13609454
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3706:
-----------------------------------
bq. Do we want slf4j-api in the .war or nothing? I think nothing is OK (as you
have it)
I don't think so - if we do that, everyone has claimed you cannot easily change
the logging impl without building a custom war.
bq. Unrelated... the .war includes restlet stuff? When I poke around the code
that is only used in tests. Is the restlet infrastructure part of solr core now?
Yes, the schema read side rest api uses it - new in 4.2.
> Ship setup to log with log4j.
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3706
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.3, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3706.patch, SOLR-3706-solr-log4j.patch,
> SOLR-3706-solr-log4j.patch
>
>
> Currently we default to java util logging and it's terrible in my opinion.
> *It's simple built in logger is a 2 line logger.
> *You have to jump through hoops to use your own custom formatter with jetty -
> either putting your class in the start.jar or other pain in the butt
> solutions.
> *It can't roll files by date out of the box.
> I'm sure there are more issues, but those are the ones annoying me now. We
> should switch to log4j - it's much nicer and it's easy to get a nice single
> line format and roll by date, etc.
> If someone wants to use JUL they still can - but at least users could start
> with something decent.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
