[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13636722#comment-13636722
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-3953:
------------------------------------
Fixing this will be a good learning experience for me. If someone else knows
exactly what to do and wants to take it off my hands, feel free.
This is part of an effort to close old issues that I have reported. Search
tag: elyograg2013springclean
> postingsFormat doesn't work on field, only on fieldType
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3953
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3953
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Affects Versions: 4.1
> Reporter: Shawn Heisey
> Assignee: Shawn Heisey
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.3
>
>
> The following schema config (adding postingsFormat) produces no changes in
> Solr's behavior. If postingsFormat="BloomFilter" is instead added to a new
> fieldType and that fieldType is used, then Solr's behavior changes. In my
> pre-deployment tests, it results in SOLR-3950.
> <field name="did" type="long" indexed="true" stored="true"
> postingsFormat="BloomFilter"/>
> Having to add a new fieldType for an alternate codec leads to configuration
> duplication and the potential for confusing problems. I would imagine that
> most people that are interested in alternate codecs will want to continue
> using an existing type.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
