On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Steve, > > > > I didn't put a "we're releasing now bomb" in, I said: > > > > "I started a release branch for Lucene / Solr 4.3 > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_3/ > > I will update the 4.x branch now and build the first RC" > > I completely disagree. This differs in no way from "we're releasing now": > you personally gave no warning that you would do this. Yes, I know what > Robert wrote; Robert gave a warning and a timeline - you didn't give a > warning, and your timeline differed from Robert's. > > > I didn't expect that this would go > > through without any respin. I'd just have appreciated to not get a > > "WTF are you doing why don't you tell us etc." if there was a warning > > like 6 days ahead. > > Again, it was not your warning, and the timeline differed. These details > matter, Simon! > apparently they only matter because it's me I guess. but that's fine I can take that. You seem to be very angry, I am sorry about that. I didn't mean to step on your toes. I wanted to volunteer to do a release and I didn't meant to do a "we release now" thing here. to me a relaese starts with a branch, that way we can port pending fixes (like mark did for 4.2.1) Building an RC doesn't mean we vote on it. For me this is something folks can integrate in their apps as I do in ES and then we can fix bug like the one I found in the Join module. This is open source and we go and do the right thing, if you want a warning before a branch is done I have to disappoint you that is only encouraging for last minute features. IMO > > If there would have been a discussion about issues > > to make it in or not because they are blocker I'd have never put any > > resistance in that. I talked to mark privately and all is good. There > > was no "there is blocker X I will port it to the RC branch", instead I > > only got complains no objections. I never said "fuck you and your > > objections" > > I didn't say you said that. *My* perception of your *tone* was: I don't > care what you think, I'm doing this, aka "fuck you and your objections". > that's your problem I guess. simon > > Steve > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
