My problem is users will put the war in their container and get ClassNotFoundExceptions.
Instead they should get some basic system.out.println-logger or some no-op implementation. 6 or 7 logging jars in our distribution and you are telling me it cant do simple stuff like this? What is the point of the 6-7 jars then? On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Steve Molloy <[email protected]> wrote: > Have to agree with the not distributing 2 wars. But externalizing the > logging jars is a great improvement for people integrating it. Repackaging > the war to change logging framework to fit the rest of your code is far > from being the best option. Adding the proper slf4j jars in your > container’s classpath makes a lot more sense.**** > > ** ** > > *Steve Molloy* > Software Architect | Information Discovery & Analytics R&D**** > > [image: > http://www.opentext.com/2/emailsupport-logo-opentext-2010.gif]<http://www.opentext.com/2/email-signature-logo> > > This email message is confidential, may be privileged, and is intended for > the exclusive use of the addressee. Any other person is strictly prohibited > from disclosing or reproducing it. If the addressee cannot be reached or is > unknown to you, please inform the sender by return email and delete this > email message and all copies immediately.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* April-26-13 10:16 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Lucene Solr 4.3.0 RC3**** > > ** ** > > I am taking it up with them. Right now before its ever released. I don't > think our pmc should release two different solr-4.3.0.war files at > different download locations. And I think the war we do release, should > work.**** > > On Apr 26, 2013 10:06 AM, "Yonik Seeley" <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As to which WAR is correct, it's answered in the *first sentence* of > >> what I quoted: > >> "Slf4j/logging jars are no longer included in the Solr webapp" > > > > > > Thats not "the answer", just because its in CHANGES.txt > > *shrug* > I wasn't involved in that change, and I really don't care myself, but > it's 100% crystal clear that removing the logging jars from the WAR > was intentional (and hence the Maven artifacts are not as intended). > If you think that the decision was incorrect, then take it up with > those that made it. > > -Yonik > http://lucidworks.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]**** >
<<image001.gif>>
