[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13651934#comment-13651934
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4655:
-----------------------------------
I'm a little confused how the tests are currently passing - makes me think
something is off.
OverseerCollectionProcesser will try and wait for the coreNodeName of:
cmd.setCoreNodeName(nodeName + "_" + subShardName);
But according to your output above, the core node name will will be core_node{n}
I'm not sure how that wait ends up working right.
> The Overseer should assign node names by default.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4655
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4655
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SolrCloud
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 4.3, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch,
> SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch
>
>
> Currently we make a unique node name by using the host address as part of the
> name. This means that if you want a node with a new address to take over, the
> node name is misleading. It's best if you set custom names for each node
> before starting your cluster. This is cumbersome though, and cannot currently
> be done with the collections API. Instead, the overseer could assign a more
> generic name such as nodeN by default. Then you can easily swap in another
> node with no pre planning and no confusion in the name.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
