[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13653604#comment-13653604
 ] 

Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4797:
--------------------------------------

[lucene_solr_4_3 commit] shalin
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1480898

SOLR-4797: Shard splitting creates sub shards which have the wrong hash range 
in cluster state. This happens when numShards is not a power of two and router 
is compositeId
                
> Sub shards have wrong hash range in cluster state except when using 
> PlainIdRouter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4797
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4797
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.3
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>             Fix For: 4.3.1
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-4797.patch
>
>
> The overseer collection processor always uses PlainIdRouter to partition the 
> hash range. However, some router implementations (most notably 
> CompositeIdRouter) can provide a different implementation to partition hash 
> ranges. So there can be a mismatch between the hash ranges which are 
> persisted in clusterstate.xml for sub shards and the actual index which is 
> split using the collection's configured router impl.
> This bug does not affect collections using PlainIdRouter.
> The overseer collection processor should always use the collection's 
> configured router to partition ranges.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to