[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erik Hatcher updated SOLR-4842:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-4842.patch

Here's a patch that demonstrates the issue clearly.  The actual problem 
reported to me (via a customer) was about facet.prefix, but I tried to distill 
it to the mincount initially missing the weird mincount/zeros interaction.

I've added two test cases, one that passes as-is, the second fails, and the 
only difference is the order of the two facet.field params, one using a 
localparam of facet.prefix, the other not.
                
> Field faceting with local params affects successive field faceting parameters
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4842
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4842
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: search, SearchComponents - other
>    Affects Versions: 4.3
>            Reporter: Erik Hatcher
>            Assignee: Erik Hatcher
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: SOLR-4842__hoss_tests.patch, SOLR-4842.patch, 
> SOLR-4842.patch
>
>
> SOLR-4717 introduced local param support for per-field faceting, allowing the 
> same field to be faceted in various ways.  There's a problem such that one 
> fields local param setting will override the defaults of the next field.  For 
> example: {code}facet.field={!key=foo facet.mincount=1 
> facet.missing=false}field&facet.field={!key=bar 
> facet.missing=true}field{code} causes the "bar" faceting to use 
> facet.mincount=1 when it should use the default of 0.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to