Again i differentiate between /core/api/index.html -> /core/4_3_0/index.html (which I think its good) and /core/api/(.*) -> /core/4_3_0/$1
The former is useful, and points to the most recent documentation. The latter is not and just causes broken links. On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > There was extension discussion about this previously on the mailing list. > > > I found this, where in fact you are the one proposing the redirect to > latest doc: http://search-lucene.com/m/HPcIC1Nx9NE1 > > If broken links are our main concern, perhaps we should deploy a BOT > checking our CMS/Wiki nightly for broken links and email the dev list if > found? > > -- > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > 22. mai 2013 kl. 23:07 skrev Robert Muir <[email protected]>: > > I would rather remove the redirect. if we want to have a redirect to a > specific index.html thats way different than a rewrite rule that is ripe > for abuse. > > There was extension discussion about this previously on the mailing list. > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Sure, broken links may be and probably have already been an issue. >> >> Anyway, the goal of this doc change was to have consistency between the >> real world and the release todo, not to get stale redirects to some random >> version. >> >> You can always open a JIRA to propose changing all of this. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> 22. mai 2013 kl. 19:24 skrev Robert Muir <[email protected]>: >> >> There was a lot of discussions about these links before. >> >> I don't think we should have such links. They just encourage broken links >> from the wiki etc. >> >> i don't want to see links like >> http://lucene.apache.org/core/api/core/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInvertState.htmlgoing >> to >> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/index/FieldInvertState.html. >> >> >> These will only break as APIs evolve. Its better to have the version >> explicit. >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> WIKI updated, please review: >>> https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo#Update_redirect_to_latest_Javadoc >>> >>> Also added redirects to the Lucene javadocs so that >>> http://lucene.apache.org/core/api/ ... now works. If that was avoided >>> on purpose for some reason, let me know and I'll remove it again. >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>> 13. mai 2013 kl. 21:20 skrev Steve Rowe <[email protected]>: >>> >>> > Good catch, Jan - feel free to add this to the ReleaseTodo wiki page >>> yourself. - Steve >>> > >>> > On May 12, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I discovered that the "doc" redirect still redirects to 4_1_0 >>> javadocs. >>> >> I changed .htaccess so it now points to 4_3_0 >>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/cms/trunk/content/.htaccess >>> >> >>> >> The Release TODO should mention updating this link - >>> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseTodo >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> > >
