[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13680840#comment-13680840
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4655:
-----------------------------------

Okay, I think something changed from 4.3 to 4.x that affects this - my other 
branch that had tests passing against 4.3 also has shard tests failing after 
updating to trunk. Don't know what it is yet, but some new information. 

I'll dig in and try and figure it out - this patch is pretty useful for 
SOLR-4916.
                
> The Overseer should assign node names by default.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4655
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SolrCloud
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>             Fix For: 4.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, 
> SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, SOLR-4655.patch, 
> SOLR-4655.patch
>
>
> Currently we make a unique node name by using the host address as part of the 
> name. This means that if you want a node with a new address to take over, the 
> node name is misleading. It's best if you set custom names for each node 
> before starting your cluster. This is cumbersome though, and cannot currently 
> be done with the collections API. Instead, the overseer could assign a more 
> generic name such as nodeN by default. Then you can easily swap in another 
> node with no pre planning and no confusion in the name.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to