[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13699748#comment-13699748
]
Anshum Gupta commented on SOLR-4998:
------------------------------------
bq. What does make sense at least is making the code consistent (existing uses
of Shard changed to Slice or Replica depending on it's actual meaning).
Right, I'll be happy to move to Slice and Replica, just that it may translate
to a lot of external changes. We certainly would want to be consistent between
the code and the external docs/calls. That was one of my motivations to use
'Shard'.
I am stil all for suggestions.
> Make the use of Slice and Shard consistent across the code and document base
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4998
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4998
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SolrCloud
> Affects Versions: 4.3, 4.3.1
> Reporter: Anshum Gupta
>
> The interchangeable use of Slice and Shard is pretty confusing at times. We
> should define each separately and use the apt term whenever we do so.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
