I was wondering the same thing. Yesterday I was going to update a page on the Solr Wiki and stopped myself after remembering this email and feeling unsure if my effort will be thrown away in favour of the new Confluence Wiki and new Solr Ref Guide.
My feeling is the new Ref Guide should serve as the new Wiki because it's much more professional. Maybe the old Solr Wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ ) should be kept running (but read-only and/or hidden), so that one can still pull a chunk of info from it and migrate to the new Wiki when needed. Otis -- Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/ Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > What's our approach to editing/updating the old wiki vs. the new ref guide? > I know from talking w/ Hoss how we are going to version it, but are we going > to maintain the docs on both wikis? I've got a minor tweak to CSV handling > that I want to document and just wondering how best to handle it. > > Other: > 1. Are we deprecating the MoinMoin for Solr? > 2. I'll add a link to the website and the old wiki. > > -Grant > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
