[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13717625#comment-13717625
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4335:
-------------------------------------
Cool Mike: regenerate seems to be working!
But now I think we need to edit [~thetaphi]'s groovy script to be a macro that
fails also if any files were modified.
We should use this for verifying the regenerated sources have not changed.
I think we should also use this in jenkins after running tests.
The precommit test can keep it off as it does now, but jenkins can be more
strict.
> Builds should regenerate all generated sources
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4335
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-4335.patch, LUCENE-4335.patch
>
>
> We have more and more sources that are generated programmatically (query
> parsers, fuzzy levN tables from Moman, packed ints specialized decoders,
> etc.), and it's dangerous because developers may directly edit the generated
> sources and forget to edit the meta-source. It's happened to me several
> times ... most recently just after landing the BlockPostingsFormat branch.
> I think we should re-gen all of these in our builds and fail the build if
> this creates a difference. I know some generators (eg JavaCC) embed
> timestamps and so always create mods ... we can leave them out of this for
> starters (or maybe post-process the sources to remove the timestamps) ...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
