[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13718491#comment-13718491
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5073:
--------------------------------------

You can always access anything allowed on the URL by specifying generic 
parameters in SolrJ, the methods in SolrJ that explicitly support other kinds 
of options are basically sugar around setting an underlying params object or 
parsing the response.

That said, supporting this parameter explicitly is not a bad thing, but I don't 
think you are blocked from making progress..

Patches welcome <G>...


                
> Improve SolrQuery class and add support for facet limit on per field basis in 
> SolrJ
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5073
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5073
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: clients - java
>    Affects Versions: 5.0, 4.4
>            Reporter: Sandro Mario Zbinden
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: facet, solrj
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> Currently the SolrQuery (org.apache.solr.client.solrj) class supports the 
> setFacetLimit(int limit) and getFacetLimit() method. 
> Recently someone added a feature to specifiy the facet.limit on a per field 
> basis. It would be great if this feature could be used from solrj.
> with setFacetLimit(String field, int limit) and getFacetLimit(String field)
> setFacetPrefix is already implemetned like this.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to