On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think we should go that far. If you extend Lucene45Codec you > basically agree to the entire index format, but are given a chance to > control per-field postings and doc values. Otherwise, make your own Codec, > and then you'll need to register it in META-INF/services. > > The assert I proposed to make in the ctor is only for "education purposes" > -- apps need not register their Lucene45CodecExtension in services. We can > document it, and assertions would help verify it. >
I don't think we need anything here really: Facet45Codec shouldnt be in META-INF. Actually Facet45Codec is not needed at all. I dont understand why we have a codec class here at all. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
