: Subject: A reference to a commercial algorithm in comments - is this all
: right?
I have no objections to the root of your concern: mentioning the
commercial plugin, and how to activate it, in the solr config comments.
In general though, i wonder if it would be simpler / more straight forward
not include either the "Currently available open source algorithms..." or
"A commercial algorithm..." sections in the example solr config at all
and instead just have a shorter comment with a pointer to a URL (either on
the solr wiki, or carrot2.org) that lists the Algos and the FQN people
should use to configure them.
That way there's less risk that the comment gets stale because we forget
to update it, or confuses someone when carrot2 adds a new algo that works
fine with Solr X.Y, but the Solr X.Y was released before that Algo was
added, so its not mentioned in the comment, etc... All of that can be
updated on whatever page the URL points to indepenent of the release.
<!-- Class name of a clustering algorithm compatible with the Carrot2
framework.
For a list of the available values for the "carrot.algorithm"
please consult:
http://project.carrot2.org/algorithms.html#solrconfig
-->
<str
name="carrot.algorithm">org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm</str>
?
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
