oh boy... I think we can backport LUCENE-5245 then as well?

simon

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael McCandless
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I hate to say it but ...
>
> I think we should respin for LUCENE-5218?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks to Markus Jelsma's thoughtful testing, other backward
>> compatibility issues of the JavaBin codec have been found and fixed
>> (SOLR-4221). Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>   
>> http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC3-rev1526423/
>>
>> The vote is open until Tuesday.
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> --
>> Adrien
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to