Yes, I did observe the same on Chrome with Json response. And it seems to
be a browser number parser issue.

Thanks,
Kranti K. Parisa
http://www.linkedin.com/in/krantiparisa



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Erick Erickson (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13779893#comment-13779893]
>
> Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-5280:
> --------------------------------------
>
> After reproducing this in Chrome, I tried to create a quick junit test and
> couldn't get it to fail there.
>
> So I tried Safari and it does NOT fail there, so it appears to be a
> browser problem.
>
> Not sure there's anything we can do about it, but don't have time to
> pursue it now.
>
> Checked the index and both the admin/schema browser and terms component
> show the correct value in the index, which I could infer from the Safari
> display too.
>
>
> > Json response doesn't take long field type well
> > -----------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: SOLR-5280
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5280
> >             Project: Solr
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components: Response Writers
> >    Affects Versions: 4.2
> >            Reporter: Liu Xiang
> >
> > In my index, one field is defined as solr.LongField.
> > After index, use solr webUI to fetch the doc.
> > by default, xml response is as following, which is correct:
> > <long>205840180000100338</long>
> > <long>205840180000102563</long>
> > Then Change "wt" to json, response is:
> > [
> >   205840180000100350,
> >   205840180000102560
> > ]
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to