[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13783039#comment-13783039
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-5292:
--------------------------------
Shawn: i feel like i'm missing something here... other then the slightly diff
logging in your patch, how would returning this new singleton be any diff then
just returning the input value in the code today?
> Add SKIP_MUTATE_SINGLETON to FieldValueMutatingUpdateProcessor
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5292
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.5
> Reporter: Shawn Heisey
> Assignee: Shawn Heisey
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.6
>
> Attachments: SOLR-5292.patch
>
>
> While trying to solve a problem, I came up with something that didn't work
> for what I was trying to do, but seemed like it might be useful for somebody.
> This allows somebody to decide during the course of a mutateValue method
> that they'd rather skip the mutate entirely - leave the source field value
> completely unchanged.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
