[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-5255.
-----------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 4.6
                   5.0

This is fixed. Thanks Jessica!

> Extraneous zookeeper call in ZkStateReader cluster state watcher and setting 
> wrong watcher
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5255
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5255
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 4.4, 4.5, 5.0
>            Reporter: Jessica Cheng
>            Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>              Labels: cloud, zookeeper
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.6
>
>
> In ZkStateReader.createClusterStateWatchersAndUpdate, in the watcher for the 
> call to watch CLUSTER_STATE:
>     List<String> liveNodes = zkClient.getChildren(
>         LIVE_NODES_ZKNODE, this, true);
>      
>     Set<String> liveNodesSet = new HashSet<String>();
>     liveNodesSet.addAll(liveNodes);
> The liveNodesSet set is never used in subsequent code, since the new cluster 
> state is made from the live node set from the existing cluster state:
>     Set<String> ln = ZkStateReader.this.clusterState.getLiveNodes();
>     ClusterState clusterState = ClusterState.load(stat.getVersion(), data, 
> ln);
> ...which is as it should since this is a watcher for cluster state (if live 
> nodes changes, the watcher for live nodes will be invoked).
> Due to the above extraneous call, however, now the cluster state watcher 
> (this) is also set on the LIVE_NODES_ZKNODE path, which is unnecessary to 
> fire when live nodes changed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to