Anyway, I filed LUCENE-5283 as a "wish". :) I'll add it in the spare
cycle -- it'll work at the module level and you can override your
local settings if you wish zero-test executions to fail your build.

Dawid

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Dawid Weiss
<dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl> wrote:
>> Wait, I think it is an error :)  Yes, a hard to fix error (our test
>> infra is complex), but still an error.
>
> It's a mistake in the filter declaration, not an error in its application.
>
>> It's like "javac foo.java" returning successfully when foo.java doesn't 
>> exist.
>
> I don't think this is particularly matching since filters are pattern
> matching. It's more like:
>
> grep "nonexistent" < input
>
> returning an error just because a pattern didn't occur in input.
>
> Like I said -- I'm really indifferent to this, I can add it. I just
> don't think we should cater for all the possible typos and errors one
> can make - this would be insane.
>
> D.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to