[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13802956#comment-13802956
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5300:
-------------------------------------
I'm not so happy about this:
{code}
@Override
public SortedSetDocValues getSortedSet(FieldInfo field) throws IOException {
if (!ordIndexes.containsKey(field.number)) {
// if (entry is missing.... look in another place)
{code}
Can we just explicitly write the way the field is encoded instead of the
fallback? The fallback could be confusing in the case of real bugs.
> SORTED_SET could use SORTED encoding when the field is actually single-valued
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5300
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5300
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-5300.patch
>
>
> It would be nice to detect when a SORTED_SET field is single-valued in order
> to optimize storage.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
