[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13803674#comment-13803674
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5381:
----------------------------------
[~jkrupan]
bq.It might be helpful to clarify the intended use cases
bq are we really talking about individual collections with many thousands of
shards?
bq.Or, are we talking more about having many thousands of collections, each of
which may only have a rather modest number of shards?
Actually this is an umbrella issue to address both.
I would probably attack the the later case first. I guess it would be easier
than having 10000s of shards
> Split Clusterstate and scale
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5381
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5381
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SolrCloud
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Original Estimate: 2,016h
> Remaining Estimate: 2,016h
>
> clusterstate.json is a single point of contention for all components in
> SolrCloud. It would be hard to scale SolrCloud beyond a few thousand nodes
> because there are too many updates and too many nodes need to be notified of
> the changes. As the no:of nodes go up the size of clusterstate.json keeps
> going up and it will soon exceed the limit impossed by ZK.
> The first step is to store the shards information in separate nodes and each
> node can just listen to the shard node it belongs to. We may also need to
> split each collection into its own node and the clusterstate.json just
> holding the names of the collections .
> This is an umbrella issue
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
