[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822304#comment-13822304
 ] 

Anca Kopetz commented on SOLR-2724:
-----------------------------------

Hi,

I do not know if my comment is useful, but I found some code that still uses 
the defaultOperator from schema.xml in solr-core-4.5.1

{code:title=DisMaxQParser.java|borderStyle=solid}
  public static String parseMinShouldMatch(final IndexSchema schema, 
                                           final SolrParams params) {
    org.apache.solr.parser.QueryParser.Operator op = 
QueryParsing.getQueryParserDefaultOperator
        (schema, params.get(QueryParsing.OP));
    return params.get(DisMaxParams.MM, op.equals(QueryParser.Operator.AND) ? 
"100%" : "0%");
  }
{code}

{code:title=QueryParsing.java|borderStyle=solid}
public static QueryParser.Operator getQueryParserDefaultOperator(final 
IndexSchema sch,
                                                       final String override) {
    String val = override;
    if (null == val) val = sch.getQueryParserDefaultOperator();
    return "AND".equals(val) ? QueryParser.Operator.AND : 
QueryParser.Operator.OR;
  }
{code}

> Deprecate defaultSearchField and defaultOperator defined in schema.xml
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2724
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Schema and Analysis, search
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.6, 4.0-ALPHA
>
>         Attachments: 
> SOLR-2724_deprecateDefaultSearchField_and_defaultOperator.patch, 
> SOLR-2724_deprecateDefaultSearchField_and_defaultOperator.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 2h
>  Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> I've always been surprised to see the <defaultSearchField> element and 
> <solrQueryParser defaultOperator="OR"/> defined in the schema.xml file since 
> the first time I saw them.  They just seem out of place to me since they are 
> more query parser related than schema related. But not only are they 
> misplaced, I feel they shouldn't exist. For query parsers, we already have a 
> "df" parameter that works just fine, and explicit field references. And the 
> default lucene query operator should stay at OR -- if a particular query 
> wants different behavior then use q.op or simply use "OR".
> <similarity> Seems like something better placed in solrconfig.xml than in the 
> schema. 
> In my opinion, defaultSearchField and defaultOperator configuration elements 
> should be deprecated in Solr 3.x and removed in Solr 4.  And <similarity> 
> should move to solrconfig.xml. I am willing to do it, provided there is 
> consensus on it of course.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to