[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13822561#comment-13822561
 ] 

Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5216:
------------------------------------

Thanks Steve, will try to keep that in mind. I always thought we must format 
the messages like Lucene-1234: message, i.e. PROJECT-number even followed by 
colon.

> Fix SegmentInfo.attributes when updates are involved
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-5216
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5216
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core/index
>            Reporter: Shai Erera
>            Assignee: Shai Erera
>             Fix For: 4.6, 5.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-5216.patch
>
>
> Today, SegmentInfo.attributes are write-once. However, in the presence of 
> field updates (see LUCENE-5189 and LUCENE-5215) this creates an issue, in 
> which if a Codec decides to alter the attributes when updates are applied, 
> they are silently discarded. This is rather a corner case, though one that 
> should be addressed.
> There were two solutions to address this:
> # Record SI.attributes in SegmentInfos, so they are written per-commit, 
> instead of the .si file.
> # Remove them altogether, as they don't seem to be used anywhere in Lucene 
> code today.
> If we remove them, we basically don't take away special capability from 
> Codecs, because they can still write the attributes to a separate file, or 
> even the file they record the other data in. This will work even with 
> updates, as long as Codecs respect the given segmentSuffix.
> If we keep them, I think the simplest solution is to read/write them by 
> SegmentInfos. But if we don't see a good use case, I suggest we remove them, 
> as it's just extra code to maintain. I think we can even risk a backwards 
> break and remove them completely from 4x, though if that's a problem, we can 
> deprecate too.
> If anyone sees a good usage for them, or better - already uses them, please 
> speak up, so we can make the proper decision.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to