I guess I voted a little too soon… I hate to be the cause of a respin, but while looking into a few things I noticed while fixing that bug over the weekend, I found that what I thought was not that critical of a bug was actually masking a couple fairly ugly bugs and was fairly dangerous itself.
Together, I think all 3 are actually quite serious problems and 2 of them are new in 4.6. I think they are worthy of a respin. I’m going to back port them, but if people would rather not respin, they can wait on the branch for 4.6.1. - Mark On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > - Mark > > On Nov 18, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Simon Willnauer <simon.willna...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please vote for the first Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.6.0 >> >> This RC includes some additional fixes related to Changes.html that >> were committed in the last days like SOLR-5397. >> >> you can download it here: >> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.6.0-RC3-rev1542975/ >> >> or run the smoke tester directly with this commandline (don't forget >> to set JAVA6_HOME etc.): >> >> python3.2 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> http://people.apache.org/~simonw/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.6.0-RC3-rev1542975/ >> 1542975 4.6.0 /tmp/smoke_test_4_6 >> >> I integrated the RC into Elasticsearch and all tests pass: >> >> https://github.com/s1monw/elasticsearch/tree/upgrade_lucene_4_6 >> >> Smoketester said: SUCCESS! [1:02:10.493223] >> >> here is my +1 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org