Hi, In addition, this is a GC bug, so it happens in the GC threads - which explains why it does not easy reproduce: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/8349/artifact/lucene/build/core/test/J0/hs_err_pid11654.log
This one happens in ConcMarkSweepGC! Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b116 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC Current thread (0xf6a14000): GCTaskThread [stack: 0xf447f000,0xf4500000] [id=11664] siginfo:si_signo=SIGSEGV: si_errno=0, si_code=1 (SEGV_MAPERR), si_addr=0x00000004 Stack: [0xf447f000,0xf4500000], sp=0xf44fef90, free space=511k Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code) V [libjvm.so+0x4475f1] ObjArrayKlass::oop_oop_iterate_nv(oopDesc*, ParScanWithoutBarrierClosure*)+0x61 V [libjvm.so+0x47326f] ParScanThreadState::trim_queues(int)+0xdf V [libjvm.so+0x473762] ParEvacuateFollowersClosure::do_void()+0x22 V [libjvm.so+0x4736ed] ParNewGenTask::work(unsigned int)+0x12d V [libjvm.so+0x58b6d9] GangWorker::loop()+0xe9 V [libjvm.so+0x58b2c8] GangWorker::run()+0x18 V [libjvm.so+0x461689] java_start(Thread*)+0x119 C [libpthread.so.0+0x6d4c] start_thread+0xcc I think the only thing we can do is to open a bug report! ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:18 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b116) - Build > # 8349 - Failure! > > Same here. I also ran the whole test suite, does not reproduce! > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > > Of Dawid Weiss > > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 11:04 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b116) > > - Build # 8349 - Failure! > > > > I can't reproduce this. I've ran the same (?) test args 20 times, no luck. > > > > Dawid > > > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Not yet tried! > > > I am not at home at the moment. > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > > > Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> schrieb: > > >>> > > >>> this JVM didn't last long ;) > > >> > > >> > > >> If only we got a penny for every JVM crash... :) > > >> > > >> Uwe -- success at reproducing? > > >> > > >> D. > > >> > > >> ________________________________ > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > > >> additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > Uwe Schindler > > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen > > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
