[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13832648#comment-13832648
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3191:
-----------------------------------
the abstract ReturnFields should not have constants. its abstract, it has no
syntax. that stuff needs to be moved to an implementation class.
Separately, SolrReturnFields.java i think has already reached the limit where
its totally un-understandable. The original discussion on this issue talked
about having a separate implementation, but it seems instead it was all piled
into ReturnFields.
What to do about fields that actually start with "-" ? Remember, not everyone
uses the lucene query parser. The assumptions listed on the beginning of this
issue about that are totally wrong.
I think we should make the ReturnFields implementation something that can be
plugged into the solrconfig without writing java code and provide alternatives
(for example: one that is simple and where the code can be understood)
> field exclusion from fl
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Luca Cavanna
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch
>
>
> I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr
> response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of
> them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude
> instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
