[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13835887#comment-13835887
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5287:
-----------------------------------
bq. So that's fine, no revert wars here.
Right - that is my point. I've seen this idea expressed before on the lists
though - that only you should revert your own commits - and that is of course
silly. We have a commit then review policy - if someone commits something
quickly and then goes on vacation and someone reviews it, I don't want this new
idea of don't revert anyone else commits to take hold. You just can't revert in
bad faith. We want to keep the 4x branch releasable, and people come and go on
their own schedule.
bq. but I'm not sure how far we can protect people from shooting themselves in
the foot.
One argument would be we could go as far as to not give them a dangerous loaded
weapon and instead do it properly with API's once we get there. I don't have a
strong opinion though - other than agreeing it should not be enabled by default.
bq. I'll see if I need to take you up on it
Just ping my name in the issue.
> Allow at least solrconfig.xml and schema.xml to be edited via the admin screen
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-5287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5287
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Schema and Analysis, web gui
> Affects Versions: 4.5, 5.0
> Reporter: Erick Erickson
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.7
>
> Attachments: SOLR-5287.patch, SOLR-5287.patch, SOLR-5287.patch,
> SOLR-5287.patch, SOLR-5287.patch
>
>
> A user asking a question on the Solr list got me to thinking about editing
> the main config files from the Solr admin screen. I chatted briefly with
> [~steffkes] about the mechanics of this on the browser side, he doesn't see a
> problem on that end. His comment is there's no end point that'll write the
> file back.
> Am I missing something here or is this actually not a hard problem? I see a
> couple of issues off the bat, neither of which seem troublesome.
> 1> file permissions. I'd imagine lots of installations will get file
> permission exceptions if Solr tries to write the file out. Well, do a
> chmod/chown.
> 2> screwing up the system maliciously or not. I don't think this is an issue,
> this would be part of the admin handler after all.
> Does anyone have objections to the idea? And how does this fit into the work
> that [[email protected]] has been doing?
> I can imagine this extending to SolrCloud with a "push this to ZK" option or
> something like that, perhaps not in V1 unless it's easy.....
> Of course any pointers gratefully received. Especially ones that start with
> "Don't waste your effort, it'll never work (or be accepted)"...
> Because what scares me is this seems like such an easy thing to do that would
> be a significant ease-of-use improvement, so there _has_ to be something I'm
> missing.
> So if we go forward with this we'll make this the umbrella JIRA, the two
> immediate sub-JIRAs that spring to mind will be the UI work and the endpoints
> for the UI work to use.
> I think there are only two end-points here
> 1> list all the files in the conf (or arbitrary from <solr_home>/collection)
> directory.
> 2> write this text to this file
> Possibly later we could add "clone the configs from coreX to coreY".
> BTW, I've assigned this to myself so I don't lose it, but if anyone wants to
> take it over it won't hurt my feelings a bit....
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
