[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13846593#comment-13846593
 ] 

Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-4260:
--------------------------------------

Agreed on the wait being necessary (which I actually annotated in the comment 
above). The crux of the issue here is that the replica (cloud85) can't sync 
with the previous leader (cloud84) because they are waiting on each other; much 
like a dead-lock. Eventually, they both give up and one wins; unfortunately in 
my test case, cloud85 wins which leads to the shard being out-of-sync because 
the wrong leader is selected in this scenario (cloud84 should have been 
selected). 

I'm continuing to dig into this but have come to the conclusion that tweaking 
the waitForReplicasToComeUp process is a dead end and it's working as well as 
it can.


> Inconsistent numDocs between leader and replica
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-4260
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4260
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>         Environment: 5.0.0.2013.01.04.15.31.51
>            Reporter: Markus Jelsma
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 5.0, 4.7
>
>         Attachments: 192.168.20.102-replica1.png, 
> 192.168.20.104-replica2.png, clusterstate.png
>
>
> After wiping all cores and reindexing some 3.3 million docs from Nutch using 
> CloudSolrServer we see inconsistencies between the leader and replica for 
> some shards.
> Each core hold about 3.3k documents. For some reason 5 out of 10 shards have 
> a small deviation in then number of documents. The leader and slave deviate 
> for roughly 10-20 documents, not more.
> Results hopping ranks in the result set for identical queries got my 
> attention, there were small IDF differences for exactly the same record 
> causing a record to shift positions in the result set. During those tests no 
> records were indexed. Consecutive catch all queries also return different 
> number of numDocs.
> We're running a 10 node test cluster with 10 shards and a replication factor 
> of two and frequently reindex using a fresh build from trunk. I've not seen 
> this issue for quite some time until a few days ago.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to