[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13448658#comment-13448658
]
Dmitry Sloutskov commented on LUCENENET-508:
--------------------------------------------
ok. I understand you. As for the separate assembly or own implementation of
these classes - decide.
As far as I know, compilers (from .NET 2.0 to .NET 3.5) are the same (JIT also
does not change... the difference only in new types of the framework... and
bugfixes :-)), so I think that it is better to support the 2.0 framework, but
using the compiler directives, turning off the code that is already present in
.NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5.
.NET 4 - they have seriously changed... .NET 4.5 - will be similar to 4.0, .NET
5.0 - i do not know.
If i can be useful for you, i can help with the implementation of these types.
What should be different from the existing implementations the code can be
published under Apache 2.0 license?
I hope not too tired you with my English?
> C# 2.0 support
> --------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-508
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-508
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: Wish
> Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 3.0.3, Lucene.Net 3.6, Lucene.Net 4.0
> Reporter: Dmitry Sloutskov
> Attachments: HashSet.cs, LinqBridge.cs
>
>
> I propose support builds in the environment NET 2.0 (required for MS SQL
> 2005/2008). I compiled version 3.0.3 adding to core\Support\Compatibility 2
> files:
> 1. LINQBridge - http://code.google.com/p/linqbridge/
> 2. HashSet <T> implementation of mono-project.
> Please consider this opportunity.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
