This is why they invented git :) https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/compare/5261b571...e4402c22c
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Christopher Currens < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm not much of an SVN guy myself, so what I wound up doing was pulling > down the two branches and used windiff on the actual directories. I could > quickly see which files were added, removed, changed, or untouched. I > guess you could do the same things with SVN probably, but I don't know how > or if it is a painless process or not. > > The biggest thing would be having multiple people working on and dividing > up the work. A lot of times, you have classes that span namespaces, so I > guess you'd have to have a policy where you'd stick to a namespace and if > you require something that someone else is porting, just stub it out for > later. > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > What was your strategy for upgrading? Just getting a list of all the svn > > changes between 3.0.3 tag and 3.6? I'm terrible with SVN, but is there an > > easy way to compare the tags? (I feel like there must be) > > > > > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:02:33 -0700 > > > Subject: Re: 3.6 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > I used 2.9.4 as a base. Some files were so bad, though, that I ported > > them > > > from scratch. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Prescott Nasser < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > As 3.0.3 is more or less ready to release, I want to talk quickly > about > > > > 3.6. For 3.0.3 Chris did a herculean job creating the initial code > > base - > > > > Chris, did you take the java code and port it all? or did you use > 2.9.4 > > > > and update the code base? > > > > > > > > > > > > >
