Fully agree on that! On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Gramana <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would also add that .NET desperately needs a good distributed hash > implementation using either a chord or gossip protocol. SolrCloud and > ElasticSearch both leverage Apache Zookeeper for managing cluster > configuration. It's something that I've been having to manager around using > other methods. That would a big win not only for Solis (my project) but for > anyone else doing distributed app dev on .NET! > > On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:26 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From the email it seems like they want a substantial project. If you > have a project nearing completion is there still enough work for them to > take on and really make something? or is it upgrades / fixes? > > > > Also - sweet! > > > > ~P > > > > ---------------------------------------- > >> CC: [email protected] > >> From: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Offer of help vis Lucere project > >> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 23:13:06 -0400 > >> To: [email protected] > >> > >> I have a fledgling OSS project that I'm close to making public that > solves distributed search (takes cues from SOLR and ElasticSearch). I would > definitely welcome help in building it out, and would unwrap it early if > they are interested (I was otherwise going to wait until after we finish > deploying it on a client project). > >> > >> On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:03 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Maybe they could work on the distributed/federated search application > that > >>> was brought up a while back? a SOLR-like project, that is unique to > >>> Lucene.Net (as opposed to porting SOLR or just bringing back the .NET > >>> remoteing model that was removed)? >
