Does anyone have any issues with moving to git? Should we discuss it at all? or should we just take a vote?
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:32:56 +0200 > Subject: Re: github mirror not up to date > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > If you haven't watched this already, please do: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8 > > I'm not really going to make any arguments. If you ever used git, you'll > just give the move your +1 without hesitation. If you haven't used git, > please try it for a few days, and you'll never want to go back to SVN again > > Beer on me to anyone who still has arguments in favor of SVN after working > with git for a month. Hell, make it a week. > > I rest my case. > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Make your arguments! lets see how convincing you can be, and how playable > > the group is ;) > > > > > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:35:33 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: github mirror not up to date > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Confirmed > > > > > > So when are we moving to git? :) > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > This should be resolved > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > Subject: RE: github mirror not up to date > > > > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:16:12 -0800 > > > > > > > > > > Ah, yeah, I knew that, but I thought that Apache's "instance" of git > > was > > > > actually github (or our own hosted version of github) - that's > > potentially > > > > my mistake. They definitely support it now. > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:49:19 -0500 > > > > > > Subject: Re: github mirror not up to date > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > git != github > > > > > > > > > > > > Git is a source control system. Github is the leading provider of > > said > > > > > > system where it wraps up the SCM plus a number of issue tracking > > and > > > > social > > > > > > coding tools. They are often used synonymously, but are definitely > > not > > > > > > synonyms. > > > > > > > > > > > > IIRC, there was some mention that ASF did support git now and had > > an > > > > > > instance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Prescott Nasser < > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > wouldn't a move to git for us mean a move to github? Semantics I > > > > suppose... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:41:42 +0200 > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: github mirror not up to date > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And thanks :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko < > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moving to git, not github. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would love to open this for discussion, now that we are past > > > > graduation > > > > > > > > > and release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Prescott Nasser < > > > > > > > [email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Opened a ticket with JIRA > > > > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5519 > > > > > > > > >> Do we want to discuss moving to github? or are people ok > > with > > > > the > > > > > > > mirror? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:16:21 +0200 > > > > > > > > >> > Subject: github mirror not up to date > > > > > > > > >> > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > To: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Can someone take it with infra so they fix whatever they > > > > forgot to > > > > > > > > >> setup? > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Itamar > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
