Good question. I'd love to have a little time to clean it up from "wyatt tossing stuff at a wall until he got the tests going" to "wyatt making a nice clean setup to point folks towards failing tests". Good news is I've got a 4.5 day weekend coming up due to Thanksgiving so I should be able to submit the cleaned up one by Friday.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Use the master branch. The branch_4x one is with your work, however the > port that was made for master was done from scratch so we are going to > discard that branch... > > For your R&D time, I think your best shot would be at looking at the > failing tests in the core and taking it from there. > > @Wyatt -- any ETA for your PR with marking the faulty tests? > > Thanks, > > -- > > Itamar Syn-Hershko > http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> > Freelance Developer & Consultant > Author of RavenDB in Action <http://manning.com/synhershko/> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Awesome, thanks Prescott and Wyatt. I'll get started there. > > > > Anyone have any insight into why master and branch_4x (where 4.x porting > > work was happening previously) diverged so much? I assume they're pretty > > much unmergeable at this point and branch_4x will be discarded. > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > Lead Software Engineer > > feature[23] > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Master is where we're at for the moment > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Wyatt Barnett<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Sent: 11/25/2014 7:14 AM > > > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: Branch Status? branch_4x vs master > > > > > > I think one should be working off the new master branch -- or at least > > that > > > is where the CI efforts are going, see > > > https://github.com/apache/lucene.net > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Paul Irwin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I have some available R&D time so I'd like to jump back in. I'm a > > little > > > > confused about the status of branch_4x vs master, it looks like > they've > > > > diverged significantly: > > > > > > > > "This branch is 462 commits ahead, 131 commits behind master" > > > > > > > > Can someone fill me in on what's going on here? It looks like I > should > > > jump > > > > in to master, but it appears to not match the commit history of > > branch_4x > > > > work that happened a while back. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Paul Irwin > > > > Lead Software Engineer > > > > feature[23] > > > > > > > > Email: [email protected] > > > > Cell: 863-698-9294 > > > > > > > > > >
